The answer you entered to the math problem is incorrect.

Nasa plans larger moon base: warfare terminology used to describe moon base.

Proposed Lunar Rover for moon base

MSNBC reports that NASA wants a 'beachhead' on the moon. Beachhead, like the marine term for amphibious landings -- although proper analysis of the term also requires me to point out that beachhead could be a euphemism for public displays of fellatio on a sandy coastline.

Here's the actual headline so you don't need to click the link:
NASA plans bigger moon base, sporty rovers
Space agency wants to land three large habitats to build moon beachhead

Beyond having fun with the term beachhead the article also mentions 3 habitats and 2 rovers capable of two week treks on the lunar surface.

Lately I have been having a hard time believing that NASA has any substance behind these plans. More importantly, I don't believe that the US government is capable of doing anything as cool as sending people to the moon. My money is that the google space x prize will be more fruitful.

Reply

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options